Jay R. Thomas

Drugs Will Kill You!

Joining a Long List of Dead Drug Abusers 

          If it turns out that Whitney Houston died as a result of her drug abuse problem, she will join a long list of talented celebrities who threw their lives away playing this deadly game.  What a tragic ending for someone with such an incredible voice and who brought enjoyment to so many people throughout the world.  For many, it takes just one instance of trying drugs to get hopelessly ‘hooked’…a good reason to never try them in the first place.  Yet there are some individuals in our country who still want to legalize drugs.  These proponents of the philosophy ‘if it feels good, do it’ have perpetrated a hoax on an unwary citizenry by starting with so called ‘medical’ marijuana.  What a joke!  Marijuana does nothing that already available medicines can’t do! 

A Heavy Price to Pay 

          The foolish proponents of legalizing drugs, like Ron Paul, Tony Bennett and Jerry Brown, ignore the heavy price abusers pay in health related problems such as HIV, chronic hepatitis C and fatal heart events induced by drugs.  And how about the effects of drug abuse on developing young minds or the many patients in burn wards because of burns sustained from trying to make methamphetamine?  It has been estimated that up to one third of patients in burn wards in major US hospitals in the South, Midwest and West are there for that reason, at a cost of $6,000 per day!  And what about all the accidents and shooting deaths directly attributable to drug abuse!  For all these reasons and many more, we must stand firm and never legalize these life destroying drugs. 

Dead Celebrities Who Reportedly Used Drugs 

          The following partial list of celebrities who used drugs and died at an early age is but a microcosm (see WOW) of the tragically large number of young people in our country who receive an early visit from the grim reaper.  Remember, you get only one chance at life.  And you’re a long time dead! 

John Belushi, 33

Chris Farley, 32

Andy Gibb, 30

Jerry Garcia, 53

Judy Garland, 47

Corey Haim, 38

Jimi Hendrix, 27

Michael Jackson, 50

Janis Joplin, 27

Heath Ledger, 28

Marilyn Monroe, 36

Jim Morrison, 27

River Phoenix, 23

Elvis Presley, 42

Brad Renfro, 25

Anna Nicole Smith, 39

Drugs Will Kill You! Read More »

The Susan G. Komen Revelation

Who Knew?

          Who would have thought that a respected charity like the Susan G. Komen Foundation, an organization with the worthy goal of finding a cure for breast cancer and supporting its victims, was all along contributing money to fund abortions?  Many of you who have contributed to Komen for the Cure must be feeling betrayed right now, wondering how they could possible reconcile supporting these two diametrically opposed causes, one preventing death and the other causing death.  How could breast cancer and abortion possibly be related?  At first we applauded the Komen Foundation’s courageous act in separating itself from the liberal Planned Parenthood organization which promotes late term abortion.  Parental discretion is advised for the following description, but late term abortion is where a fully formed, perfect, living baby is killed inside the womb by decapitation.  In a disappointing reversal under pressure from the Pro-Choice ‘to kill babies’ extremists in the country, Komen caved and reinstated its relationship with Planned Parenthood.

Alternatives to Komen

          I’m sure that Ms. Komen who died of breast cancer at the age of 36 in 1980 would turn over in her grave if she knew her name was now associated with abortion.  Until the Komen Foundation divorces itself from the business of baby killing, many are urging that we send our contributions to other organizations that strictly fund breast cancer related projects.  One worthy alternative would be the Avon Walk for Breast Cancer.  There are also many universities and hospitals which do breast cancer research and I am sure they would be happy to receive direct contributions, as well.  A perusal of the full grant disclosure issued by the Avon Foundation for Women confirms that they made no contributions to Planned Parenthood in 2009 or 2010.  I was unable to find a full grant disclosure for the National Breast Cancer Foundation on the internet and would be interested to hear from anyone who might have information about this organization as another possible alternative.  At least we have learned a lesson from this unfortunate incident.  Even the most virtuous sounding charities must be carefully vetted before we send them our hard earned dollars.

The Susan G. Komen Revelation Read More »

The Capital of Slovenia from Ljubljana Castle

Slovenia Confirms Conservative Government

Yet Another Conservative EU Nation 

          Joining a growing list of European nations, the parliament of Slovenia has confirmed conservative Janez Jansa as prime minister.  Jansa’s five party coalition holds 50 of 90 seats in parliament, putting the center right majority in the country on solid footing.  Echoing familiar calls throughout the world, Jansa’s Slovenian Democratic Party has promised to cut taxes, raise the retirement age, reduce government regulations, balance the budget and reduce the deficit.  One of their first challenges will be to ease the credit crunch and restore the country’s credit rating.  Slovenia now joins a number of other nations in Europe with conservative governments, including the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Sweden.

The Capital of Slovenia from Ljubljana Castle
The Capital of Slovenia from Ljubljana Castle

Slovenia Confirms Conservative Government Read More »

Goldwater Campaigns During 1964 Presidential Election

Republicans Risk Repeat of 1964

Birth of the Conservative Movement

          The nomination of Barry Goldwater as the standard bearer for the Republican Party in the 1964 Presidential Election marked the beginning of the Conservative Movement in America.  For the first time, conservatives rallied around a candidate with a fervor not seen before nor since, for that matter, at least not until the modern Tea Party movement took shape in the wake of the failed Obama presidency.  Forty-eight years ago, Republicans chose Goldwater over other outstanding candidates, like Nelson Rockefeller, William Scranton and George Romney, all governors of key states who might have had broader appeal, but were not as conservative.  Going against all odds with Goldwater in a political climate that favored liberals, the Republicans ultimately went down to a crushing defeat, winning only 6 states and 38.5% of the vote.  Many believe that it was worth the effort back in 1964 just to have an opportunity to flex the political muscles and demonstrate the burgeoning might of conservatives, laying the groundwork for the future victories of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan.  The question now comes down to whether we can afford risking another such defeat in the 2012 Presidential Election, an election that many believe will be ‘do or die’ for the American Way.

Goldwater Campaigns During 1964 Presidential Election
Goldwater Campaigns During 1964 Presidential Election

Gingrich Surge Changes Everything 

          We love Newt Gingrich and would be very happy to have him as our president.  Gingrich would be an outstanding leader and we will work hard to elect him if he is the nominee.  But does he have broad enough appeal to garner the votes needed to beat Barack Obama?  Are Americans just looking for an intelligent, skilled debater in their president?  Isn’t that what we have now.  While these are tremendously important attributes, Gingrich’s strong conservative views along with his well documented past history, some of which may be over the baggage allowance, could be a turn off for many voters who might otherwise support a Republican candidate.  On the other hand, those conservative creds were apparently just what the people in South Carolina were looking for.  One thing’s for sure…in this rapidly changing primary campaign, more fluid than any we have seen in recent history, Gingrich has now made it a competitive race.

Romney’s 25% Ceiling of Support

          Just a week ago it looked like Mitt Romney had things all sewn up for the Republican Nomination.  But then his ‘win’ in the Iowa Caucuses was unceremoniously snatched away from him followed shortly thereafter by his distant second finish in the South Carolina primary.  His future is anything but certain now.  Most would agree that Romney is experienced, articulate, and conservative enough to satisfy most Tea Party Patriots in the general election.  He also has the looks, charisma and presidential demeanor that many voters seem to want.  Finally, we believe the perception that he is ‘center-right’ would appeal to many independent voters and their support will be critical if the Republicans are to retake the White House.  All that notwithstanding, Mitt Romney simply has not been able to break through that 25% ceiling of steady support that he has maintained over the last six years.

But 2012 is Not 1964

          The big difference between now and 48 years ago is a little thing called ‘fair and balanced news’.  Back then there were only three major television networks and they were all in the tank for the Democrats.  The ‘beloved’ Walter Cronkite, anchor of the CBS Evening News, for example, was a close personal friend of the Kennedys and a known left wing liberal.  Jumping back to 2012, the cable news networks now offer an attractive alternative and are actually more popular than the ‘mainstream media’ news broadcasts, which many believe have lost their relevancy.  An additional change in the political climate that favors conservatives this time around is reflected in a 2009 Gallup Poll which showed that nearly twice as many Americans identified themselves as conservative (40%) as opposed to liberal (21%), with a significant 35% identifying as moderate.  It goes without saying that the zeal with which many of those conservatives are approaching the 2012 Presidential Elections cannot be underestimated.  Think Tea Party Patriots!  Republicans will now have to decide whether to go for broke with Newt and galvanize the conservatives or play it safe with Mitt and attract those moderates.  Couldn’t we just have both of them!

 

         

Republicans Risk Repeat of 1964 Read More »